Google wins patent for location-based advertising

While the blogosphere was buzzing over the patent Facebook won for its news feed last week, Google earned a killer one too. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office awarded the search giant a patent for using location in an advertising system last Tuesday, which is the emerging business model for most consumer-facing location startups today.

Filed six years ago, the patent is fairly broad. It covers using location for targeting, setting a minimum price bid for an ad, offering performance analytics, and modifying the content of an ad.

As we argued last week regarding Facebook’s news-feed patent, it’s uncertain whether other startups should be alarmed by this. It’s standard for large companies to file patents on technology they have developed as a defensive practice, rather than as a tool for pressuring other companies to desist or pay license fees.

However, the location-based ad patent may give Google a nice big stick as it goes head-to-head with Apple in the world of mobile advertising. Both companies have acquired or agreed to acquire a mobile ad network in the last three months; Google agreed to buy Admob for $750 million in November, while Apple bought Quattro Wireless in January. Google actually bucked a patent Apple owns last month, when it added multi-touch functionality to its Android operating system. Perhaps this is the card the search giant had up its sleeve.

Location-enabled search and advertising has been a major priority for Google over the past year. Last week, it started letting users refine their search by location to see results published nearby. The company’s newly-launched Buzz service also has location feeds with content that often beats out what Twitter’s geotagged tweets have to offer.

Here’s the abstract of the patent, titled “Determining and/or using location information in an ad system”:

The usefulness, and consequently the performance, of advertisements are improved by allowing businesses to better target their ads to a responsive audience. Location information is determined (or simply accepted) and used. For example, location information may be used in a relevancy determination of an ad. As another example, location information may be used in an attribute (e.g., position) arbitration. Such location information may be associated with price information, such as a maximum price bid. Such location information may be associated with ad performance information. Ad performance information may be tracked on the basis of location information. The content of an ad creative, and/or of a landing page may be selected and/or modified using location information. Finally, tools, such as user interfaces, may be provided to allow a business to enter and/or modify location information, such as location information used for targeting and location-dependent price information. The location information used to target and/or score ads may be, include, or define an area. The area may be defined by at least one geographic reference point (e.g., defined by latitude and longitude coordinates) and perhaps additional information. Thus, the area may be a circle defined by a geographic reference point and a radius, an ellipse defined by two geographic reference points and a distance sum, or a polygon defined by three or more geographic reference points, for example.

Google was also awarded six other patents last week including:

Electronic message source reputation information system

Data reconstruction from shared update log

Identifying inadequate search content

Filtering search results using annotations

Pricing across keywords associated with one or more advertisements

Deconstructing electronic media stream into human recognizable portions

It has also filed for these patents, published last week:

User Interface for Selecting Options

Parallel, Side-Effect Based DNS Pre-Caching

System and Method for Monitoring and Analyzing Internet Traffic

Content Item Slot Scheduling

Competitive Advertising Server

User Interface Gestures For Moving a Virtual Camera On A Mobile Device

Dynamic Exploration Of Electronic Maps

Navigation In a Three Dimensional Environment Using An Orientation Of A Mobile Device

Anchored Navigation In A Three Dimensional Environment On A Mobile Device

Next Story:
Previous Story:

Tags: , , ,

Companies:




Photo of Kim-Mai Cutler

About the Author, Kim-Mai Cutler

Kim-Mai was born and raised a stone's throw from Apple headquarters in Cupertino by a devout Hewlett-Packard family. After attending UC Berkeley, Kim-Mai worked for Bloomberg, The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires in New York, Los Angeles, London and Buenos Aires. Follow her on Twitter at @kimmaicutler or send her an e-mail here.

  • coco1212
    With Google investing heavily in its employees it's not surprising that they won a patent they missed 6 years ago, after all they have some of the brightest minds of the planet working for them. I first noticed location-based ads on blairrewards and after that, they started popping up everywhere, a very good investment indeed.
  • This post will help in marketing sector.Thanks for giving such kinds of information.
  • PurchaseTramadol
    Thanks for good Post. Buy celexa Buy carisoprodol Buy butalbital apap. Thanks
  • davidhussy
    Hi,

    Thanks for good Posting.

    David Hussy
    http://www.glasyads.com
  • stephen kurtzman
    This patent is ridiculous. Prior art exists. I filed a patent in 1997 (and was awarded it) that includes geolocation as a targeting engine. The patent itself does not cover the implementation of the geolocation engine, but geographic targeting was mentioned in the patent and geographic targeting was implemented, sold, and used in the marketplace in 1997 and beyond.

    Short story: The patent process is broken. This will be adjudicated in court.
  • How broad is the new patent? I mean is it for the algorithms they use to accomplish the location-based ads, or for the idea itself? The idea of location-targeting ads seem fairly obvious and non-patentable on its own. What implications does the patent have on other ad companies?
  • abrahaph
    Here are papers published in 2001 and 2003 describing location advertising in the open source mobilemaps search engine:

    http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?articl... [directionsmag.com]
    http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?articl... [directionsmag.com]

    If anyone is interested in contesting this patent, one of the original authors is contactable on abrahaph AT yahoo's .co.uk website.
  • Mark D.
    Note to the author: You can't use just any old URL. Some URLs have content that changes over time. The PTO web site may return a different patent every day if you don't actually query (and thus generate a URL based on) patent number. In short, even the "corrected" URL is going to break any day now.

    One of the ways to help people around this problem is to actually cite the patent number (7,668,832 in this case) then people can work around broken links themselves.
  • jjm
    the article links to the wrong patent. here is the correct patent.
    http://www.google.com/patents?id=W7aWAAAAEBAJ&p...
  • Thanks. I just fixed it. The link worked this morning. I'm not sure why it broke. The patent you're linking to is the initial application, which was published in 2005.
  • jambalaya
    hmmm, is this new? Three years ago, Local.com was awarded a location-based search patent: http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Localco...
  • Richard
    Google's patent 7,668,832 was filed on April 12, 2004 and Local.com's patent (as a provisional) was filed on May 8, 2004.
  • tonecoke
    I think this is irrelevant. Typical American lawyer fodder solely benefiting their business over actual productive companies. I firmly believe it has no relevance over the world at large.
  • Romi_Parmar
    PleaseRobMe.com = the natural consequence of open social networks that exposes location data

    I wonder if this patent will mean I can sue google if an advertiser uses my location data in a way that negatively affects me?

    http://blog.the3gdatingagency.com/2010/03/01/pl...
  • Ryan
    Surprised, and very disappointed. This is hardly an invention. Instead, this is patent front-running, and simply connecting what will be obvious practices once technology catches up.
  • exactly... isn't a patent suppose to be non-obvious?
  • This really confuses me. Can I get a patent for advertising in particular citys? How can they get a patent for such a common, non-complex idea. So does this mean other advertising companies can't display location based ads then?

    I particularly agree with Ryanve's comment below and would too like an answer to this.
  • can someone explain to me how you can get such a broad patent. location based ads arn't new...
  • onsip
    Location-based advertising is starting to be popular on a bunch of websites. Does this cover third party ads on your website or location-based display in general? Facebook displays ads based on location; but, perhaps that isn't covered under this patent because it's a text grab from users' profiles? Interesting blog - Thanks.

    www.onsip.com
    Advanced Business VoIP
  • sanjaymaharaj
    This is really interesting, how will it affect location based start ups? This will give Google a huge advantage as it capatilizes on location base enterprise which is the next big thing in mobile platforms
blog comments powered by Disqus